Pirate3D aspired to be the world’s leading provider of consumer 3D printing solutions by creating a 3D printer that was simple to use and affordable! So, what led to its downfall?
In this newsletter, we’re excited to share our second in-depth case study with you, investigating why the startup Pirate3D failed and what you can learn from its mistakes.
The full version of this premium content is only available for paid subscribers. If you like this short version, see more of it by becoming a paid member! ❤️
Company Overview
Pirate3D is a 3D printer manufacturer. Its 3D printer, the Buccaneer, was intended to be a user-friendly consumer printer and was listed as the most successful Fused Filament Fabrication project on Kickstarter (US) in 2013.
- Description: 3D printing, Fused Filament Fabrication, Product Design, and Mechatronics
- Category: 3D printing, 3D technology, Consumer Electronics, Robotics
- Country: Singapore
- Period: 2012–2015
- Size of the company: 11–5
- Number of funding rounds: 3
- Number of investors: 1
- Total amount raised: USD 3.9 million (USD 1.4 million from Kickstarter)
Pirate3D had the vision of becoming the world’s leading provider of consumer 3D printing solutions by making a 3D printer that’s user-friendly, affordable, and accessible to everyday consumers. With such a nice goal, why did it fail?
The Beginning
Brendan Goh and Tsang You Jun, both Materials Science undergraduates at Nanyang Technology University (NTU), met through a school assignment in which they had trouble assembling and getting a 3D printer to work. After meeting Roger Chang, a 3D printing enthusiast and business undergraduate from the National University of Singapore, the trio intended to start a 3D printing service. However, they were later advised by Neo Kok Beng, an adjunct associate professor at NUS Business School to design a 3D printer instead.
They launched Pirate3DP in August 2012 after graduating from university.
The Failure Points
So, what went wrong with Pirate3D?
- Failure Point #1: The Failure to Manage the Value Chain
- Failure Point #2: Over-reliance on Kickstarter
- Failure Point #3: Failure to Understand End-To-End Processes in Software and Hardware Development
- Failure Point #4: Error in Product Pricing
The Startups Failure Checklist
Pirate3D achieved more than 14 times its Kickstarter campaign target of USD 100,000 with USD 1.4 million raised. Refer to the checklist summary of failure points and what can you do about it below:
The People
- Delegate the main responsibilities and support
- Start small and celebrate small wins mentality
The Process
3. Set up processes to monitor key financial and project metrics
4. Control and checking system in place
The Product
5. Understand the nature of the products/offerings
6. Product Pricing
What’s next?
The full in-depth edition of the Pirate3D case study is only available for paid subscribers, but there’s a lot more to come for FREE by subscribing to our newsletter. Plus, don’t miss out on a brief checklist of takeaways to help you scale your business
If you want to receive comprehensive, fully-packed case studies presented in an easy-to-digest format like this, become a paid subscriber to save you time and effort.
Have you seen our offer? Our low-cost newsletter is now even lower! Initially 5 USD/month, now 50% off!
Learn from BlackStorm Consulting’s unique methodology and data-driven solutions — a growth boutique that specialises in corporate strategy, profit management and investment management.
Disclaimers
*All information extracted from external sources was correct as the article was posted. The information contained in this article represents the authors’ views, and opinions that are based on public data available online and do not necessarily reflect the position of the organisations mentioned in the article.
Hyperlinks for the information obtained from external sources are provided in the article. Please click on the links for updates on the information provided in the respective articles. Please email media@blackstormco.asia for any enquiries or clarifications on information contained within the article.